I dreamed that I was in a room. I think it was a kitchen. I was speaking to a woman and she was crying. She was trying to tell me something but it was upsetting her. She was trying to hold back the tears and stop from openly crying. Her eyes were red and I could see the tears.
We were standing at opposite ends of one of those kitchen islands. She said ‘Raymond, I don’t want to tell you, I don’t want to have to …” She was really upset. I told her it was okay that there was nothing for her to worry about. That she is only prophesying the future not making it happen. I told her that if she told me that I would be better prepared for it when it comes. Perhaps I could even avoid it. And then she said something about 4. I assumed it meant four days. I walked closer to her, she was still crying and I woke up.
The symbols are there... Kitchen ... Planning / cooking stage 4 ... warned I also had a dream a while back (2-3 weeks ago) that made me think of 911 as "ground zero" (right under the surface of a large body of water) Out of the next 20 days, that's this one that has a target date on it... Like two weeks... (14 years) ... at least for the Wild West (western society)
There is also a lot of chatter coming though the other realm .. as it gets closer
raymond1234 wrote: 4........4 warned......maybe 4 days ?........maybe it is a double entendre.
Maybe we will know something by Friday.
Thanks.
Well in this kind of event, it's wise to go on proactive status, than reactive... So you want to flash the 911 Dingbat light to all those extras to get into this DREAM MOODS SPOILER LIGHT STATUS
LOOKS LIKE IT's TIME 4 - "The Hunt 4 the Red October" ... could be a North Korean, USSR made SECRET SUB with a nuke ... WAT, I say about 4 subs could be this kind of Red October class sub. Does anyone really know if more than one nuke goes off who fired them? Does anyone know if these Subs have nuclear warheads... and do they have to fire them if there have communist-kaze drivers? Breaking News.... Top secret ... I-spy stuff... WAT
Tokyo — South Korea’s military has expressed concern at intelligence reports that indicate that more than 50 North Korean submarines have sortied from their bases.
The sheer number of vessels that have put to sea means it is impossible to track all of the submarines, officials said, even though the boats are largely outdated and technically obsolescent versions produced in the 1960s for the Soviet Union.
Nevertheless, by swamping the South’s maritime defences, the North’s submarines may be able to land infiltration parties on the coast to carry out attacks behind the front line. Alternatively, they may target warships of the South Korean or US navies.... MayB communist-kaze
Three ways China's currency plunge affects your money
Donald Trump is no fan of China.
The Republican presidential candidate has promised to bring American jobs back from China, and a major part of his stump speech is a pledge to "not let China rip us off any longer."
Now, Trump has a new line of attack, courtesy of the People's Bank of China's decision to let the yuan trade more freely, which has set off the currency's biggest decline in two decades.
"[China] continuously cuts their currency, they devalue their currency," Trump said during a campaign stop in Birch Run, Michigan. "They've been doing this for years -- this isn't just starting."
A weak currency cheapens the price of a country's exports, making them more attractive to international buyers by undercutting competitors.
Many experts disagree with Trump's analysis.
The International Monetary Fund, for example, says the yuan is fairly valued. And while it's true that the currency has depreciated this week, many analysts have praised China for following through on its commitment to allow market forces more influence over the currency.
The yuan, also called the renminbi, has appreciated 14% since mid-2014, according to Daiwa Capital Markets.
Trump, however, said that China is "making it absolutely impossible for the United States to compete," and doing so without suffering any consequences.
"China has no respect for President Obama whatsoever -- whatsoever," he said. "They think we're run by a bunch of idiots, and what's going on with China, it's unbelievable."
If you want to make some easy money- play the markets to go down! by Batman » Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:23 am
I just work up from a dream as I watch mostly middle class to poor people fall into the void of debt by corrupt system of judges, no one could afford proper counsel and could not argue against
Good piece here on it. I was shown the same thing a few nights ago by a recently deceased person about the future: the image of a train with dynamite tied to the tracks a short distance ahead, then a further short distance ahead, another set of dynamite. When the first event happens, people will say, 'Oh, that, that happens sometimes, we can fix that.' But then soon after will be a second event, and that will be the 'Wham' one. Your $20 will overnight be worth 20c, or whatever.
Batman wrote:I have been following that train for a while now.. I have some of the details .. On Feb. 17 I had a dream in which I was lead to watch the ball (volley ball/ money ball .. This summer) and it was coming from Asia markets .. Now China stock market is tanking and the government is propping it up by the U.S. Cash reserve it had collected.. it's pumping a lot of fuel for the fire .. Look for this all to come down around summers end.. called "FALL"!
Well I won't be surprised. It's like the Chinese, Korean and the Japanese seems to have this mentality to be always on top while the others should stay below. Korea isn't whole (North and South Korea), the Japanese invaded a lot in WW II and now China's gonna be one of the primary reason for the upcoming WW III. As for the market in Asia- let them. I want to see where this is going.
Well as numbers go the U.S. Is out in front, followed by China and then Japan as one can see economies and the inequitable distribution of income is present at the global level where the nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of the top ten economies adds up to 65 percent of the world’s economy, and the top 15 economies add up to 75 percent. The remaining 172 countries constitute only 25 percent of the world’s economy.
So everyone with half a brain can see that there is going to be a major restructuring that happens.
I don't understand what they're playing at, there, but then I don't understand high finance ...... I have trouble just managing my own money!
I had a short dream recently where I was looking at some Chinese people, middle-aged businessmen types, and boy, did they look angry. They were all shouting and enraged at something
Almost everyone who opposes the deal President Obama has struck with Iran hotly contests his relentless insistence that the only alternative to it is war. No, they claim, there is another alternative, and that is “a better deal.”
To which Mr. Obama responds that Iran would never agree to the terms his critics imagine could be imposed. These terms would include the toughening rather than the lifting of sanctions; “anytime, anywhere” nuclear-plant inspections instead of the easily evaded ones to which he has agreed; the elimination rather than the freezing of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure; and the corresponding elimination of the “sunset” clause that leaves Iran free after 10 years to build as many nuclear weapons as it wishes.
Since I too consider Mr. Obama’s deal a calamity, I would be happy to add my voice to the critical chorus. Indeed, I agree wholeheartedly with the critics that, far from “cutting off any pathway Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon,” as he claims, the deal actually offers Tehran not one but two paths to acquiring the bomb. Iran can either cheat or simply wait for the sunset clause to kick in, while proceeding more or less legally to prepare for that glorious day.
Opinion Journal Video
Editorial Page Editor Paul Gigot on news that the nuclear pact doesn’t mandate a complete accounting of Tehran’s program. Photo credit: Associated Press.
Unfortunately, however, I am unable to escape the conclusion that Mr. Obama is right when he dismisses as a nonstarter the kind of “better deal” his critics propose. Nor, given that the six other parties to the negotiations are eager to do business with Iran, could these stringent conditions be imposed if the U.S. were to walk away without a deal. The upshot is that if the objective remains preventing Iran from getting the bomb, the only way to do so is to bomb Iran.
And there’s the rub. Once upon a time the U.S. and just about every other country on earth believed that achieving this objective was absolutely necessary to the safety of the world, and that it could be done through negotiations. Yet as the years wore on, it became increasingly clear to everyone not blinded by wishful delusions that diplomacy would never work.
Simultaneously it also became clear that the U.S. and the six other parties to the negotiations, despite their protestations that force remained “on the table,” would never resort to it (and that Mr. Obama was hellbent on stopping Israel from taking military action on its own). Hence they all set about persuading themselves that their fears of a nuclear Iran had been excessive, and that we could live with a nuclear Iran as we had lived with Russia and China during the Cold War.
Out the window went the previously compelling case against that possibility made by authoritative scholars like Bernard Lewis, and with it went the assumption that the purpose of the negotiations was to prevent Iran from getting the bomb.
For our negotiating partners, the new goal was to open the way to lucrative business contracts, but for Mr. Obama it was to remove the biggest obstacle to his long-standing dream of a U.S. détente with Iran. To realize this dream, he was ready to concede just about anything the Iranians wanted—without, of course, admitting that this was tantamount to acquiescence in an Iran armed with nuclear weapons and the rockets to deliver them.
To repeat, then, what cannot be stressed too often: If the purpose were still to prevent Iran from getting the bomb, no deal that Iran would conceivably agree to sign could do the trick, leaving war as the only alternative. To that extent, Mr. Obama is also right. But there is an additional wrinkle. For in allowing Iran to get the bomb, he is not averting war. What he is doing is setting the stage for a nuclear war between Iran and Israel.
The reason stems from the fact that, with hardly an exception, all of Israel believes that the Iranians are deadly serious when they proclaim that they are bound and determined to wipe the Jewish state off the map. It follows that once Iran acquires the means to make good on this genocidal commitment, each side will be faced with only two choices: either to rely on the fear of a retaliatory strike to deter the other from striking first, or to launch a pre-emptive strike of its own.
Yet when even a famous Iranian “moderate” like the former President Hashemi Rafsanjani has said—as he did in 2001, contemplating a nuclear exchange—that “the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality,” how can deterrence work?
The brutal truth is that the actual alternatives before us are not Mr. Obama’s deal or war. They are conventional war now or nuclear war later. John Kerryrecently declared that Israel would be making a “huge mistake” to take military action against Iran. But Mr. Kerry, as usual, is spectacularly wrong. Israel would not be making a mistake at all, let alone a huge one. On the contrary, it would actually be sparing itself—and the rest of the world—a nuclear conflagration in the not too distant future.
This morning I had a dream where the enemy had crack part of this...
"Submarine code" could partially be cracked as one or two codes were cracked ... Could have the entire U.S. fleet at risk. as I jotted this down ... it reminded me of how England cracked the Nazi code. Probably goes computer hacking ... Though it could go to Seventy seven and 9-28
But yes, I am starting to look at markets...
JERUSALEM - Israel's attorney general has ordered a criminal investigation into excessive spending at the residences of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The announcement followed a report by the state comptroller, which said large sums of public money were spent on food, wine, furniture and gardening at Netanyahu's official residence in Jerusalem and a private luxury villa on the Mediterranean coast.
It's an embarrassment for the prime minister as the cost of living for normal Israelis soars. Evening news programs feature almost-daily stories about ordinary families who can't make it through the month.
With wages low, many people simply can't afford to buy a home or other basics. The average apartment costs in the region of $400,000. Food prices are up, and gasoline is running $6.70 per gallon.
Critics say Netanyahu is out of touch with the people.
And the investigation is a second blow to Netanyahu following the Iran nuclear deal reached last week by six world powers -- including Israel's most important ally, the U.S. -- and the Islamic Republic.
The Israeli leader had staked his political career on stopping the deal. He campaigned so hard to prevent it, including a controversial speech to the U.S. Congress in March, that he drew the ire of the Obama administration and, many believe, seriously harmed relations with the U.S.
That has provided cannon fodder for the Israeli opposition. Yair Lapid, who heads the centrist Yesh Atid party, slammed Netanyahu's diplomatic campaign as a "colossal failure."
"I also am not thrilled by Obama's polices. But Netanyahu crossed a line that caused the White House to stop listening to Israel," Lapid charged. "In the last year we weren't even in the arena, we had no representative in Vienna, our intelligence cooperation was harmed, and the door to the White House was closed to us. He should resign, because if you promise for years that only you can prevent this deal and then it's signed, you're responsible."
If that were not enough, Netanyahu currently controls a shaky right-wing coalition government with a razor-thin majority in the 120-member Knesset (Israeli parliament); only 61 seats. The leadership edge is so tenuous that if just one coalition member bolts, it could bring down the government.
This has subjected the Israeli leader to political blackmail. For instance, the ultra-Orthodox parties -- some of the most bitterly opposed to the Iran talks -- are getting a big piece of the state-funded national pie, infuriating the secular majority.
Netanyahu has often forbidden coalition members from travelling abroad, fearing their absence could enable the opposition to bring down the government in a hastily-called no-confidence vote.
To prop up his fragile coalition, he has been courting the opposition Labor Party, but dovish Labor leader Yitzhak Herzog says he won't serve as a fig leaf for Netanyahu's reckless policies.
"As I have said over and over again, I am not going to join the government," Herzog declared. "We must not give it a lifeline or lend our support in any way. We must replace this government today, tomorrow, as soon as possible."
The government is only two months old, and its collapse is not imminent. Cabinet ministers and coalition members are never eager to give up the benefits and perks that come with the reins of power.
"He can survive. The question is what quality of life he will have," said Amit Segal, a political commentator for Israel's Channel 2 TV. "It's hard to see him pushing forward with anything big."
Israel is notorious for political turmoil and few governments serve out their four-year terms. With the brewing scandal, backlash from the Iran crisis, a simmering conflict with the Palestinians and a one-seat majority in parliament, it seems increasingly likely that Netanyahu's fourth term in office will suffer the same fate.
Filed by CBS Radio News correspondent Robert Berger
by raymond1234 » Tue Sep 08, 2015 3:06 pm
... BE DRESSED AND READY TO GO BATTY 
