Friday, December 12, 2014

666 meaning

Edit:  - I figured out the 666 code to mean something else that is a person, and deals with money "personal matter" ... as if you take numbers under...
  1. Turning the number into a something of meaning is the key to unlocking the name of the Antichrist. Revelation 13:18 is the applicable verse: "This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666."

Postby BlueOpossum » Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:49 am 
I hope no one really believes numbers or marks are inherently evil. Otherwise, there are a lot of worksheet stacks I need to toss.  :computer:

Well 3 strikes and you out is not a good sign in my book. Here. 
Also seeing 666 is not a good sign (as that # $666 a Divorce Judge who I claimed as evil forced that on me) 

So yes! I think seeing numbers can be "inherently evil" as some numbers can be "inherently good"

Re: Has anyone ever seen this symbol?

Postby BlueOpossum » Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 am 

666 is just the "number of man" or of the "beast" of economy if you believe selling things is "wrong", aka the Roman Numeral system (first six symbols).

In order: DCLXVI
Which is 666. Numbers themselves, just like letters themselves, are only "bad" in context.

Ever seen this symbol?

Postby Batman » Thu Dec 11, 2014

It reads...

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666. (‭Revelation‬ ‭13‬:‭18‬ NIV) 

8-) This calculates out in my ARITHMETIC CODE to 2/3 or 66.6% of Mankind that is not Christian in this end time...
It goes to "MAN" and not God. 

Now to the "Beast$" 
The 1st $erpent is a Green back. 
The 2nd € $erpent is EU 

as the next serpent would be Japan's (and that is no real big threat) in this kind of  :computer: realm of using numbers.

... So it's not based on old Roman style... it's about Christians seeing the monatary systems turn into monsters by criminals in governments!

666 is also the symbols 4 "majority line"

No comments:

Post a Comment